AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, J. A.

Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4599-4604, Vol. 66, No. 11
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Genetic Control of Resistance to the Sterol 14alpha -Demethylase Inhibitor Fungicide Prochloraz in the Cereal Eyespot Pathogen Tapesia yallundae

Paul S. Dyer 1* Jacqueline Hansen 1 Andrew Delaney 1 and John A. Lucas 2

School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, and IACR-Long Ashton Research Station, University of Bristol, Long Ashton, Bristol BS18 9AF, United Kingdom

Received 4 May 2000/Accepted 31 July 2000

Sexual crosses were used to determine the genetic basis of resistance to the sterol 14 alpha -demethylase inhibitor fungicide prochloraz in the cereal eyespot pathogen Tapesia yallundae. Three different crosses between sensitive parental strains (22-432 and 22-433 [the concentration required to inhibit growth by 50% {IG50} for each was <= 0.03 mg/liter]) and field isolates from France and New Zealand with differing levels of resistance (PR11 [IG50 = 0.5 mg/liter], PR1 [IG50 = 1.0 mg/liter], and 11-3-18 [IG50 = 2.4 mg/liter]) yielded progeny showing a bimodal distribution, with an even number of sensitive and resistant progeny. This indicated the segregation of a single major gene for resistance in each cross, which was confirmed by the use of backcrosses, crosses between F1 progeny, and control crosses between sensitive parents. However, there was also evidence of additional quantitative genetic components responsible for the increased IG50s of the more resistant isolates. A further cross was made between isolate PR11 and an F1 progeny arising from isolate 11-3-18, and this also yielded progeny which were entirely prochloraz resistant. This suggested that resistance genes were allelic in these two isolates, with resistance conferred by a gene at the same locus (or closely linked loci), despite the fact that the isolates (PR11 and 11-3-18) originated from different continents.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 115 9513203. Fax: 44 (0) 115 9513274. E-mail: Paul.Dyer{at}Nottingham.ac.uk.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4599-4604, Vol. 66, No. 11
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.