AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuwae, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hosokawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuwae, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hosokawa, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kuwae, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hosokawa, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3407-3412, Vol. 65, No. 8
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Determination of Abundance and Biovolume of Bacteria in Sediments by Dual Staining with 4',6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole and Acridine Orange: Relationship to Dispersion Treatment and Sediment Characteristics

Tomohiro Kuwae* and Yasushi Hosokawa

Marine Environment Division, Port and Harbour Research Institute, 3-1-1, Nagase, Yokosuka 239-0826, Japan

Received 18 March 1999/Accepted 18 May 1999

We measured the abundance and biovolume of bacteria in intertidal sediments from Tokyo Bay, Japan, by using a dual-staining technique (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and acridine orange) and several dispersion techniques (ultrasonic cleaner, ultrasonic sonicator, and tissue homogenizer). Dual staining reduced serious background fluorescence, particularly when used for silt-, clay-, and detritus-rich sediments, and allowed us to distinguish bacteria from other objects during both counting and sizing. Within the studied samples, the number of bacterial cells ranged from 0.20 × 109 to 3.54 × 109 g of wet sediment-1. With the cleaner and sonicator treatments, the bacterial numbers for all of the sites initially increased with dispersion time and then became constant. For the homogenizer treatments, the highest bacterial numbers were observed with the shortest (0.5- to 2-min) treatments, and the counts then declined steeply as the homogenization time increased, indicating that cell destruction occurred. The cleaner treatment had the possibility of insufficient dispersion of bacteria for fine-grain sediments. Within the studied samples, the bacterial biovolume ranged from 0.07 to 0.22 µm3. With the cleaner and sonicator treatments, the biovolume peaked during the shorter dispersion time. This pattern was caused not by cell destruction but by the incremental portion of dispersed small cells. We concluded that with the cleaner and sonicator treatments, the longer dispersion time reflected the real size spectrum and was preferable for accurate estimation of mean bacterial biovolumes.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Port and Harbour Research Institute, 3-1-1, Nagase, Yokosuka 239-0826, Japan. Phone: 81 468 44 5019. Fax: 81 468 44 6243. E-mail: kuwae{at}cc.phri.go.jp.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3407-3412, Vol. 65, No. 8
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.