AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benstead, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benstead, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, H. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Benstead, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, H. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol, March 1998, p. 1091-1098, Vol. 64, No. 3
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Methanol Promotes Atmospheric Methane Oxidation by Methanotrophic Cultures and Soilsdagger

J. Benstead, G. M. King,* and H. G. Williams

Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine 04573

Received 3 September 1997/Accepted 23 December 1997

Two methanotrophic bacteria, Methylobacter albus BG8 and Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, oxidized atmospheric methane during batch growth on methanol. Methane consumption was rapidly and substantially diminished (95% over 9 days) when washed cell suspensions were incubated without methanol in the presence of atmospheric methane (1.7 ppm). Methanotrophic activity was stimulated after methanol (10 mM) but not methane (1,000 ppm) addition. M. albus BG8 grown in continuous culture for 80 days with methanol retained the ability to oxidize atmospheric methane and oxidized methane in a chemostat air supply. Methane oxidation during growth on methanol was not affected by methane deprivation. Differences in the kinetics of methane uptake (apparent Km and Vmax) were observed between batch- and chemostat-grown cultures. The Vmax and apparent Km values (means ± standard errors) for methanol-limited chemostat cultures were 133 ± 46 nmol of methane 108 cells-1 h-1 and 916 ± 235 ppm of methane (1.2 µM), respectively. These values were significantly lower than those determined with batch-grown cultures (Vmax of 648 ± 195 nmol of methane 108 cells-1 h-1 and apparent Km of 5,025 ± 1,234 ppm of methane [6.3 µM]). Methane consumption by soils was stimulated by the addition of methanol. These results suggest that methanol or other nonmethane substrates may promote atmospheric methane oxidation in situ.

* Corresponding author. Phone: (207) 563-3146, ext. 207. E-mail: gking{at}maine.maine.edu.

dagger Contribution 312 from the Darling Marine Center.




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.