AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Jul 1997, 2679-2685, Vol 63, No. 7
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Two-Dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of the Acid Tolerance Response in Listeria monocytogenes LO28

B O'Driscoll, CGM Gahan and C Hill
Microbiology Department & National Food Biotechnology Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Listeria monocytogenes is capable of withstanding low pH after initial exposure to sublethal acidic conditions, a phenomenon termed the acid tolerance response (B. O'Driscoll, C. G. M. Gahan, and C. Hill, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1693-1698, 1996). Treatment of L. monocytogenes LO28 with chloramphenicol during acid adaptation abrogated the protective effect, suggesting that de novo protein synthesis is required for the acid tolerance response. Analysis of protein expression during acid adaptation by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed changes in the levels of 53 proteins. Significant protein differences were also evident between nonadapted L. monocytogenes LO28 and a constitutively acid-tolerant mutant, ATM56. In addition, the analysis[S_TABC] revealed differences in protein expression between cells induced with a weak acid (lactic acid) and those induced with a strong acid (HCl). Comparison of both acid-adapted LO28 and ATM56 revealed that both are capable of maintaining their internal pH (pH(infi)) at higher levels than nonadapted control cells during severe acid stress. Collectively, the data demonstrate the profound alterations in protein synthesis which take place during acid adaptation in L. monocytogenes and ultimately lead to an increased ability to survive severe stress conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.