This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fedi, S. Articles by O'Gara, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fedi, S. Articles by O'Gara, F. Agricola Articles by Fedi, S. Articles by O'Gara, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 11 1997, 4261-4266, Vol 63, No. 11
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Evidence for signaling between the phytopathogenic fungus Pythium ultimum and Pseudomonas fluorescens F113: P. ultimum represses the expression of genes in P. fluorescens F113, resulting in altered ecological fitness

S Fedi, E Tola, Y Moenne-Loccoz, DN Dowling, LM Smith and F O'Gara
Microbiology Department, University College, Cork, Ireland.

There is increasing evidence that communication between members of the same species, as well as members of different species, is important for the survival of microorganisms in diverse ecological niches, such as the rhizosphere. To investigate whether the phytopathogen Pythium ultimum could alter gene expression in the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens F113, which protects the roots of sugar beet from the fungus, a screening system was developed to detect differential expression of bacterial genes in the presence of P. ultimum. The transposon Tn5, containing a promoterless lacZ reporter gene, was used to generate a library of transcriptional gene fusions in P. fluorescens F113. By this screening procedure, five P. fluorescens F113 gene clusters were identified and shown to be repressed in the presence of P. ultimum. The ecological fitness of three of the five reporter mutants in the rhizosphere of seed-inoculated sugar beet was lower than that of the wild type. Furthermore, all five mutants were impaired in their ability to subsequently colonize the rhizosphere of uninoculated sugar beet sown repeatedly in the same soil. With the exception of reporter mutant SF10, which was impaired in nitrogen metabolism, the reporter mutants had growth requirements and biocontrol abilities similar to those of the wild type. This is the first reported case of a fungus repressing the expressing of bacterial genes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Romano, J. D., Kolter, R. (2005). Pseudomonas-Saccharomyces Interactions: Influence of Fungal Metabolism on Bacterial Physiology and Survival. J. Bacteriol. 187: 940-948 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Duffy, B., Keel, C., Defago, G. (2004). Potential Role of Pathogen Signaling in Multitrophic Plant-Microbe Interactions Involved in Disease Protection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 1836-1842 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Whipps, J. M. (2001). Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 52: 487-511 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dunne, C., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., de Bruijn, F. J., O’Gara, F. (2000). Overproduction of an inducible extracellular serine protease improves biological control of Pythium ultimum by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain W81. Microbiology 146: 2069-2078 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Duffy, B. K., Défago, G. (1999). Environmental Factors Modulating Antibiotic and Siderophore Biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens Biocontrol Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2429-2438 [Abstract] [Full Text]