AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philippot, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lensi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Philippot, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lensi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Philippot, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lensi, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Apr 1995, 1426-1430, Vol 61, No. 4
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Use of Tn5 Mutants To Assess the Role of the Dissimilatory Nitrite Reductase in the Competitive Abilities of Two Pseudomonas Strains in Soil

L Philippot, A Clays-Josserand and R Lensi
Ecologie Microbienne du Sol URA CNRS 1450, Universite Claude Bernard-Lyon I, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

We examined the influence of soil aeration state and plant root presence on the comparative survival of wild-type bacteria and isogenic Tn5 (Nir(sup-)) mutants lacking the ability to synthesize nitrite reductase. Two denitrifying Pseudomonas strains with different nitrite reductase types were used. Enumeration of bacteria in sterile and nonsterile soils was based on differential antibiotic resistance. The validity of the bacterial models studied (i.e., equal growth of wild-type and mutant bacteria under aerobic conditions and significantly better growth of wild-type bacteria under denitrifying conditions) was verified in pure-culture studies. In sterile soil, both strains survived better under aerobic than under anaerobic conditions. The lower efficiency of denitrification than O(inf2) respiration in supporting bacterial growth explained this result, and the physical heterogeneity of soil did not strongly modify the results obtained in pure-culture studies. In nonsterile soil, one of the Pseudomonas strains survived better under anaerobic conditions while the other competed equally with the indigenous soil microflora under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. However, when the Nir(sup-)-to-total inoculant ratios (wild type plus Nir(sup-) mutant) were analyzed, it appeared that the presence of nitrite reductase conferred on both Pseudomonas strains a competitive advantage for anaerobic environment or rhizosphere colonization. This is the first attempt to demonstrate with isogenic nondenitrifying mutants that denitrification can contribute to the persistence and distribution of bacteria in fluctuating soil environments.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.