AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Givaudan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boemare, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Givaudan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boemare, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Givaudan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boemare, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Apr 1995, 1408-1413, Vol 61, No. 4
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Swarming and Swimming Changes Concomitant with Phase Variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus

A Givaudan, S Baghdiguian, A Lanois and N Boemare
Pathologie Comparee, Universite Montpellier II, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique--Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (URA 1184), CP101, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France

Xenorhabdus spp., entomopathogenic bacteria symbiotically associated with nematodes of the family Steinernematidae, occur spontaneously in two phases. Phase I, the variant naturally isolated from the infective-stage nematode, provides better conditions than the phase II variant for nematode reproduction. This study has shown that Xenorhabdus phase I variants displayed a swarming motility when they were grown on a suitable solid medium (0.6 to 1.2% agar). Whereas most of the phase I variants from different Xenorhabdus spp. were able to undergo cycle of rapid and coordinately population migration over the surface, phase II variants were unable to swarm and even to swim in semisolid agar, particularly in X. nematophilus. Optical and electron microscopic observations showed nonmotile cells with phase II variants of X. nematophilus F1 which lost their flagella. Flagellar filaments from strain F1 phase I variants were purified, and the molecular mass of the flagellar structural subunit was estimated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to be 36.5 kDa. Flagellin from cellular extracts or culture medium of phase II was undetectable with antiserum against the denatured flagellin by immunoblotting analysis. This suggests that the lack of flagella in phase II cells is due to a defect during flagellin synthesis. The importance of such a difference of motility between both phases is discussed in regard to adaptation of these bacteria to the insect prey and the nematode host.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.