This Article Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atlas, R. M. Articles by Huntington, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atlas, R. M. Articles by Huntington, M. K. Agricola Articles by Atlas, R. M. Articles by Huntington, M. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 04 1995, 1208-1213, Vol 61, No. 4
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Legionella contamination of dental-unit waters

RM Atlas, JF Williams and MK Huntington
Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.

Water samples collected from 28 dental facilities in six U.S. states were examined for the presence of Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella spp. by the PCR-gene probe, fluorescent-antibody microscopic, and viable-plate-count detection methods. The PCR and fluorescent-antibody detection methods, which detect both viable and viable nonculturable Legionella spp., gave higher counts and rates of detection than the plate count method. By the PCR-gene probe detection method, Legionella spp. were detected in 68% of the dental-unit water samples and L. pneumophila was detected in 8%. Concentrations of Legionella spp. in dental-unit water reached 1,000 organisms per ml or more in 36% of the samples, and 19% of the samples were in the category of 10,000/ml or above. L. pneumophila, when present in dental-unit water, never reached concentrations of 1,000/ml or more. Microscopic examination with fluorescent-antibody staining indicated that the contamination was in the dental-unit water lines rather than in the handpieces. Legionella spp. were present in 61% of potable water samples collected for comparative analysis from domestic and institutional faucets and drinking fountains; this percentage was not significantly different from the rate of detection of Legionella spp. in dental-unit water. However, in only 4% of the potable water samples did Legionella spp. reach concentrations of 1,000 organisms per ml, and none was in the 10,000 organisms-per-ml category, and so health- threatening levels of Legionella spp. in potable water were significantly lower than in dental-unit water. L. pneumophila was found in 2% of the potable water samples, but only at the lowest detectable level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Huntington, M. K., Williams, J. F., Mackenzie, C. D. (2007). Endotoxin contamination in the dental surgery. J Med Microbiol 56: 1230-1234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bartoloni, J. A., Porteous, N. B., Zarzabal, L. A. (2006). Measuring the validity of two in-office water test kits. Journal of the American Dental Association 137: 363-371 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schel, A. J., Marsh, P. D., Bradshaw, D. J., Finney, M., Fulford, M. R., Frandsen, E., Ostergaard, E., ten Cate, J. M., Moorer, W. R., Mavridou, A., Kamma, J. J., Mandilara, G., Stosser, L., Kneist, S., Araujo, R., Contreras, N., Goroncy-Bermes, P., O'Mullane, D., Burke, F., O'Reilly, P., Hourigan, G., O'Sullivan, M., Holman, R., Walker, J. T. (2006). Comparison of the Efficacies of Disinfectants To Control Microbial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practices across the European Union. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 1380-1387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• PORTEOUS, N. B., REDDING, S. W., THOMPSON, E. H., GROOTERS, A. M., DE HOOG, S., SUTTON, D. A. (2003). Isolation of an unusual fungus in treated dental unit waterlines. Journal of the American Dental Association 134: 853-858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Walker, J. T., Bradshaw, D. J., Fulford, M. R., Marsh, P. D. (2003). Microbiological Evaluation of a Range of Disinfectant Products To Control Mixed-Species Biofilm Contamination in a Laboratory Model of a Dental Unit Water System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 3327-3332 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• DEPAOLA, L. G., MANGAN, D., MILLS, S. E., COSTERTON, W., BARBEAU, J., SHEARER, B., BARTLETT, J. (2002). A review of the science regarding dental unit waterlines. Journal of the American Dental Association 133: 1199-1206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Donlan, R. M., Costerton, J. W. (2002). Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 167-193 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Monarca, S., Grottolo, M., Renzi, D., Paganelli, C., Sapelli, P., Zerbini, I., Nardi, G. (2000). Evaluation of environmental bacterial contamination and procedures to control cross infection in a sample of Italian dental surgeries. Occup. Environ. Med. 57: 721-726 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• MILLS, S. E. (2000). THE DENTAL UNIT WATERLINE CONTROVERSY: DEFUSING THE MYTHS, DEFINING THE SOLUTIONS. Journal of the American Dental Association 131: 1427-1441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Walker, J. T., Bradshaw, D. J., Bennett, A. M., Fulford, M. R., Martin, M. V., Marsh, P. D. (2000). Microbial Biofilm Formation and Contamination of Dental-Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 3363-3367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Newsome, A. L., Scott, T. M., Benson, R. F., Fields, B. S. (1998). Isolation of an Amoeba Naturally Harboring a Distinctive Legionella Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 1688-1693 [Abstract] [Full Text]