This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Karsten, G. R. Articles by Drake, H. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Karsten, G. R. Articles by Drake, H. L. Agricola Articles by Karsten, G. R. Articles by Drake, H. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Mar 1995, 1039-1044, Vol 61, No. 3
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Comparative Assessment of the Aerobic and Anaerobic Microfloras of Earthworm Guts and Forest Soils

GR Karsten and HL Drake
Lehrstuhl fur Okologische Mikrobiologie, BITOK, Universitat Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany

Aerobic and anaerobic microbial potentials of guts from earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister and Octolasium lacteum (Oerl.)) collected from a beech forest were evaluated. On the basis of enumeration studies, microbes capable of growth under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions were more numerous in the earthworm intestine than in the beech forest soil from which the worms were obtained. The intestine of worms displayed nearly equivalent aerobic and anaerobic microbial growth potentials; in comparison, soils displayed greater aerobic than anaerobic microbial growth potentials. Hence, the ratio of microbes capable of growth under obligately anaerobic conditions to those capable of growth under aerobic conditions was higher with the worm intestine than with the soil. Process level studies corroborated these population differentials: (i) under anaerobic conditions, worm gut homogenates consumed glucose, cellobiose, or ferulate more readily than did soil homogenates; and (ii) under aerobic conditions, worm gut homogenates consumed cellobiose or oxygen more readily than did soil homogenates. Collectively, these results reinforce the general concept that the earthworm gut is not microbiologically equivalent to soil and also suggest that the earthworm gut might constitute a microhabitat enriched in microbes capable of anaerobic growth and activity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Horn, M. A., Mertel, R., Gehre, M., Kastner, M., Drake, H. L. (2006). In Vivo Emission of Dinitrogen by Earthworms via Denitrifying Bacteria in the Gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 1013-1018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horn, M. A., Ihssen, J., Matthies, C., Schramm, A., Acker, G., Drake, H. L. (2005). Dechloromonas denitrificans sp. nov., Flavobacterium denitrificans sp. nov., Paenibacillus anaericanus sp. nov. and Paenibacillus terrae strain MH72, N2O-producing bacteria isolated from the gut of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55: 1255-1265 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ihssen, J., Horn, M. A., Matthies, C., Gossner, A., Schramm, A., Drake, H. L. (2003). N2O-Producing Microorganisms in the Gut of the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa Are Indicative of Ingested Soil Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 1655-1661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horn, M. A., Schramm, A., Drake, H. L. (2003). The Earthworm Gut: an Ideal Habitat for Ingested N2O-Producing Microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 1662-1669 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Furlong, M. A., Singleton, D. R., Coleman, D. C., Whitman, W. B. (2002). Molecular and Culture-Based Analyses of Prokaryotic Communities from an Agricultural Soil and the Burrows and Casts of the Earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1265-1279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Matthies, C., Grießhammer, A., Schmittroth, M., Drake, H. L. (1999). Evidence for Involvement of Gut-Associated Denitrifying Bacteria in Emission of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) by Earthworms Obtained from Garden and Forest Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 3599-3604 [Abstract] [Full Text]