This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bragard, C. Articles by Maraite, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bragard, C. Articles by Maraite, H. Agricola Articles by Bragard, C. Articles by Maraite, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Mar 1995, 1020-1026, Vol 61, No. 3
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Genetic Diversity among Xanthomonas campestris Strains Pathogenic for Small Grains

C Bragard, V Verdier and H Maraite
Unite de Phytopathologie, Universite Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, and Laboratoire de Phytopathologie, Institut Francais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Developpement en Cooperation (ORSTOM), 34032 Montpellier, France

A collection of 51 Xanthomonas campestris strains from throughout the world was studied to detect and assess genetic diversity among pathogens of small grains. Isolates from barley, bread wheat, bromegrass, canary grass, cassava, maize, orchard grass, rice, rough-stalked meadow grass, rye, timothy, and triticale were analyzed by pathogenicity tests on bread wheat cv. Alondra and barley cv. Corona, indirect immunofluorescence, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Three probes were used for the RFLP analysis. They were an acetylaminofluorene-labelled 16S+23S rRNA probe from Escherichia coli and two (sup32)P-labelled restriction fragments from either plasmidic (pBSF2) or chromosomal (pBS8) DNA of X. campestris pv. manihotis. Strains clustered in 9 and 20 groups with the rRNA probe and the pBSF2 DNA probe, respectively. Strains of X. campestris pv. graminis, X. campestris pv. phleipratensis, and X. campestris pv. poae are shown to be related but are also distinguishable by RFLP patterns, serology, and pathogenicity on bread wheat. Strains pathogenic only for barley and not for wheat grouped together. Another group is temporarily designated deviant X. campestris pv. undulosa. These South American isolates from bread wheat did not react by indirect immunofluorescence and produced atypical lesions in pathogenicity tests. The results stress the need to perform pathogenicity tests before strains are named at the pathovar level. The importance of the different probes used for epidemiological studies or phylogenetic studies of closely related strains is underlined.