AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Warren, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 September; 58(9): 2954-2959
Copyright © 1992, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Influence of Solid Surface, Adhesive Ability, and Inoculum Size on Bacterial Colonization in Microcosm Studies {dagger}

Tessie M. Warren, Valerie Williams and Madilyn Fletcher*

Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland System, 600 East Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202

ABSTRACT

Microcosm studies were performed to evaluate the effect of solid surfaces, bacterial adhesive ability, and inoculum size on colonization success and persistence of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Xanthomonas maltophilia, each with a Tn5 insertion that conferred resistance to kanamycin and streptomycin. Two types of microcosms were used: (i) a simple system that was colonized by Aeromonas hydrophila and a coryneform and (ii) a complex system produced from lake water enrichment cultures. Simple microcosms contained 100 ml of peptone- and yeast extract-supplemented artificial lake water or 60 ml of peptone- and yeast extract-supplemented artificial lake water with 70 g of 3-mm glass beads. Complex microcosms contained 100 ml of lake water with no nutrient additions or 100 ml of lake water with 70 g of glass beads. The microcosms were incubated for 35 days at 20°C. In lake water enrichment microcosms, the presence of beads increased the abilities of P. fluorescens or X. maltophilia to colonize, but their numbers decreased with time in microcosms both with and without beads. The adhesiveness of the bacteria, measured in an in vitro assay, did not relate to colonization success. In simple microcosms, the inoculum size (10, 102, or 103) of P. fluorescens did not influence colonization success. However, in complex microcosms, an inoculum of 103 cells was insufficient to ensure colonization by P. fluorescens, while 106 cells resulted in colonization of liquid and beads. Simple microcosm studies, utilizing only a few species, were poor models for complex natural systems. In complex enrichment systems, colonization of surfaces resulted in higher numbers of organisms but did not noticeably promote persistence. Adhesiveness of a particular organism may be a relatively minor factor influencing its ability to colonize solid surfaces in complex natural environments.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.

{dagger} Contribution no. 30 of the Center of Marine Biotechnology.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 September; 58(9): 2954-2959
Copyright © 1992, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.