This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Viles, C L Articles by Sieracki, M E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Viles, C L Articles by Sieracki, M E Agricola Articles by Viles, C L Articles by Sieracki, M E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 February; 58(2): 584-592

Measurement of marine picoplankton cell size by using a cooled, charge-coupled device camera with image-analyzed fluorescence microscopy.

School of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062.

ABSTRACT

Accurate measurement of the biomass and size distribution of picoplankton cells (0.2 to 2.0 microns) is paramount in characterizing their contribution to the oceanic food web and global biogeochemical cycling. Image-analyzed fluorescence microscopy, usually based on video camera technology, allows detailed measurements of individual cells to be taken. The application of an imaging system employing a cooled, slow-scan charge-coupled device (CCD) camera to automated counting and sizing of individual picoplankton cells from natural marine samples is described. A slow-scan CCD-based camera was compared to a video camera and was superior for detecting and sizing very small, dim particles such as fluorochrome-stained bacteria. Several edge detection methods for accurately measuring picoplankton cells were evaluated. Standard fluorescent microspheres and a Sargasso Sea surface water picoplankton population were used in the evaluation. Global thresholding was inappropriate for these samples. Methods used previously in image analysis of nanoplankton cells (2 to 20 microns) also did not work well with the smaller picoplankton cells. A method combining an edge detector and an adaptive edge strength operator worked best for rapidly generating accurate cell sizes. A complete sample analysis of more than 1,000 cells averages about 50 min and yields size, shape, and fluorescence data for each cell. With this system, the entire size range of picoplankton can be counted and measured.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sieracki, M. E., Cucci, T. L., Nicinski, J. (1999). Flow Cytometric Analysis of 5-Cyano-2,3-Ditolyl Tetrazolium Chloride Activity of Marine Bacterioplankton in Dilution Cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2409-2417 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kuehn, M., Hausner, M., Bungartz, H.-J., Wagner, M., Wilderer, P. A., Wuertz, S. (1998). Automated Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Semiautomated Image Processing for Analysis of Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 4115-4127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blackburn, N., Hagström, A., Wikner, J., Cuadros-Hansson, R., Bjørnsen, P. K. (1998). Rapid Determination of Bacterial Abundance, Biovolume, Morphology, and Growth by Neural Network-Based Image Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 3246-3255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fukuda, R., Ogawa, H., Nagata, T., Koike, I. (1998). Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 3352-3358 [Abstract] [Full Text]