AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baloga, A O
Right arrow Articles by Harlander, S K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baloga, A O
Right arrow Articles by Harlander, S K
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baloga, A O
Right arrow Articles by Harlander, S K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 August; 57(8): 2324-2331

Comparison of methods for discrimination between strains of Listeria monocytogenes from epidemiological surveys.

A O Baloga and S K Harlander

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108.

ABSTRACT

Total cellular DNA from 28 strains of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from food implicated in food-borne illness and from patients with listeriosis was digested with the restriction endonucleases HindIII, HaeIII, and EcoRI. Following agarose gel electrophoresis, the fragments were subjected to Southern blot hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probe transcribed from Escherichia coli 16S and 23S rRNA. The patterns of bands from genomic (DNA fingerprints) and rDNA fingerprints (ribotypes) were used for classifying L. monocytogenes strains, and the resulting subtypes were compared with serotyping and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis classification schemes. A total of 15 distinct and identical groups were obtained when genomic DNA was digested with either HindIII or HaeIII. The most discriminating enzyme for ribotyping of strains was EcoRI, which divided the 28 strains of L. monocytogenes into 6 ribotype groups. DNA fingerprinting and ribotyping differentiated L. monocytogenes from other Listeria spp., including L. ivanovii, L. welshimeri, and L. innocua as well as the lactic acid bacteria Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and subsp. cremoris. L. monocytogenes strains isolated from four independent food-borne illness incidents were analyzed by all typing methods. Patient and product isolates were not distinguishable by serotyping, ribotyping, or multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. DNA fingerprinting was the only method capable of differentiating these strains, or conversely, of proving relatedness of patient-product pairs of isolates. This method was a relatively simple, sensitive, reproducible, and highly discriminating method for epidemiological tracking of L. monocytogenes implicated in food-borne illness.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 August; 57(8): 2324-2331




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.