AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kubicek, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kubicek, C. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Messner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kubicek, C. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 March; 57(3): 630-635

Carbon Source Control of Cellobiohydrolase I and II Formation by Trichoderma reesei

Robert Messner* and Christian P. Kubicek

Abteilung für Mikrobielle Biochemie, Institut für Biochemische Technologie und Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria

ABSTRACT

Regulation of the formation and secretion of two cellulase components from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414, cellobiohydrolases I and II (CBH I and CBH II, respectively), by the carbon source was investigated. With monoclonal antibodies against CBH I and CBH II it was found that during cultivation on carbon sources which enable fast growth (glucose, glycerol, and fructose), no formation of CBH I occurred, whereas low levels of CBH II were formed. Lactose and cellulose, which allow comparably slower growth, promoted the formation of both CBH I and CBH II. However, noncarbohydrate carbon sources as citrate or acetate, which also enable only slow growth, did not promote the formation of CBH I or CBH II. The addition of glucose or glycerol to lactose- or cellulose-pregrown mycelia, on the other hand, only partially reduced the formation of CBH I. This reduction was also achieved by several other metabolizable and nonmetabolizable carbon compounds, e.g., fructose, galactose, ß-methylglucoside, 2-deoxyglucose, and rhamnose, as well as by transfer to no carbon source at all. This result indicates that the control of CBH I synthesis by the carbon source is due to induction and not to repression. The use of cycloheximide and 5-fluorouracil as inhibitors at and before translation, respectively, revealed a half-life for CBH I mRNA of at least several hours, which may, at least in part, account for the prolonged synthesis of some CBH I under these conditions. Northern (RNA) hybridization with full copies of cbh1 and cbh2 genes indicated that the control of CBH I and CBH II biosyntheses by the carbon source operates mainly at the pretranslational level. We conclude that the low rate of cellulase synthesis on glucose and some other carbon sources is due to the lack of an inducer and not to carbon source repression.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 March; 57(3): 630-635




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.