AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nesbakken, T
Right arrow Articles by Hornes, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nesbakken, T
Right arrow Articles by Hornes, E
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nesbakken, T
Right arrow Articles by Hornes, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 February; 57(2): 389-394

Comparative study of a DNA hybridization method and two isolation procedures for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in naturally contaminated pork products.

T Nesbakken, G Kapperud, K Dommarsnes, M Skurnik and E Hornes

Norwegian Meat Research Laboratory, Oslo.

ABSTRACT

We compared a DNA-DNA hybridization assay, using a synthetically produced oligonucleotide probe, and two conventional isolation procedures (methods A and B) with regard to their relative efficiency in detecting Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in naturally contaminated pork products. Method A was as described by Wauters et al. (Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:851-854, 1988). Method B has been recommended by the Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (method no. 117, 1987). The genetic probe was used in a colony hybridization assay to detect virulent yersiniae at each of the isolation steps with composed methods A and B. A total of 50 samples of raw pork products obtained from 13 meat-processing factories in Norway were examined. Y. enterocolitica serogroup O:3, biovar 4, was isolated from altogether 9 (18.0%) of the samples by using the two isolation procedures. In contrast, colony hybridization using the genetic probe indicated that 30 (60.0%) of the samples contained virulent yersiniae. All samples which were positive on cultivation were also positive by hybridization. The results indicate that the occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Norwegian pork products is substantially higher than previously demonstrated and, therefore, reinforce our suggestion that pork products represent an important potential source of human infection in Norway. The results also indicate that the use of conventional isolation procedures may lead to considerable underestimation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pork products.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 February; 57(2): 389-394




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.