AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lanham, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lanham, E. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lanham, E. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 June; 56(6): 1649-1655
Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Characterization of Rhizobacteria Associated with Weed Seedlings {dagger}

Robert J. Kremer*, Maria Fatima T. Begonia, Lynn Stanley and Eric T. Lanham

1 Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, 2 Columbia, Missouri 65211

ABSTRACT

Rhizobacteria were isolated from seedlings of seven economically important weeds and characterized for potential phytopathogenicity, effects on seedling growth, and antibiosis to assess the possibility of developing deleterious rhizobacteria as biological control agents. The abundance and composition of rhizobacteria varied among the different weed species. For example, fluorescent pseudomonads represented from 11 to 42% of the total rhizobacterial populations from jimsonweed and lambsquarters, respectively. Other bacteria frequently isolated were nonfluorescent pseudomonads, Erwinia herbicola, Alcaligenes spp., and Flavobacterium spp. Only 18% of all isolates were potentially phytopathogenic, based on an Escherichia coli indicator bioassay. However, the proportion of isolates that inhibited growth in seedling assays ranged from 35 to 65% depending on the weed host. Antibiosis was most prevalent among isolates of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp., the activity of which was due to siderophore production in over 75% of these isolates. Overall, rhizobacterial isolates exhibited a complex array of properties that were inconsistent with accepted definitions for plant growth-promoting and deleterious rhizobacteria. It is suggested that for development of effective biological control agents for weed control, deleterious rhizobacteria must be screened directly on host seedlings and must possess several properties including high colonizing ability, specific phytotoxin production, and resistance or tolerance to antibiotics produced by other rhizosphere microorganisms, and they must either synthesize or utilize other bacterial siderophores.

FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.

{dagger} Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series no. 10997.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 June; 56(6): 1649-1655
Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.