AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honeyfield, D C
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honeyfield, D C
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J R
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Honeyfield, D C
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 March; 56(3): 724-729

Assay for the enzymatic conversion of indoleacetic acid to 3-methylindole in a ruminal Lactobacillus species.

D C Honeyfield and J R Carlson

Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-6320.

ABSTRACT

An assay to measure the rate of enzymatic formation of 3-methylindole (3MI) from indoleacetic acid (IAA) in Lactobacillus sp. strain 11201 was developed. The reaction mixture contained 50 micrograms of microbial protein per ml (range, 25 to 100 mg/ml), essential low-molecular-weight reaction ingredients, and radiolabeled IAA as substrate (range, 0 to 2 mM IAA). The reaction was anaerobic for 25 min at 39 degrees C. The apparent Michaelis-Menten constants were: Km, 0.14 mM IAA; and Vmax, 64 nmol 3MI.mg-1.min-1. The inhibitors avidin, aminopterin, and EDTA had no effect on the 3MI-forming enzyme. Dithionite stimulated the 3MI-forming enzyme. The product of the reaction, 3MI, acted as a noncompetitive inhibitor of the enzyme. Enzyme activity was associated with the cell wall fraction after sonication; treatment with the French press; or treatment with detergents, proteolytic enzymes, and EDTA.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 March; 56(3): 724-729




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.