AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gouet, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gouet, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gouet, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 October; 56(10): 3081-3087
Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effects of Physicochemical Factors on the Adhesion to Cellulose Avicel of the Ruminal Bacteria Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes

Valérie Roger, Gérard Fonty*, Sylvie Komisarczuk-Bony{dagger} and Philippe Gouet

1 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, INRA, CR de Clermont-Ferrand—Theix, 63122 Ceyrat, Laboratoire de Biologie Comparée des Protistes, CNRS URA 138, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont II, 63170 Aubière, 2 and Station de Recherches de Nutrition, INRA, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, 3 France

ABSTRACT

Ruminococcus flavefaciens adhered instantly to cellulose, while Fibrobacter succinogenes had the highest percentage of adherent cells after about 25 min of contact between bacteria and cellulose. Adhesion of R. flavefaciens was unaffected by high concentrations of sugars (5%), temperature, pH, oxygen, metabolic inhibitors, and lack of Na+. In contrast, the attachment was affected by the removal of divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), the presence of cellulose derivatives (methylcellulose and hydroxyethylcellulose), and cystine. Adhesion of F. succinogenes was sensitive to low and high temperatures, high concentrations of glucose and cellobiose (5%), hydroxyethylcellulose (0.1%), redox potential, pH, lack of monovalent cations, and the presence of an inhibitor of membrane ATPases or lasalocid and monensin. Cells of F. succinogenes heated at 100°C no longer were adherent. On the other hand, adhesion was insensitive to the lack of divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), the presence of 2,4-dinitrophenol, tetrachlorosalicylanilide, or inhibitors of the electron transfer chains. Adhesion of F. succinogenes seems to be related to the metabolic functions of the cell. External proteins and/or cellulases themselves might play a part in the attachment process. Several mechanisms are probably involved in the adhesion of R. flavefaciens, the main one being the interaction between the large glycocalyx and the divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+. Hydrophobic bonds and enzymes may also be involved.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.

{dagger} Present address: Laboratoire de la Chaire d'Alimentation, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 October; 56(10): 3081-3087
Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.