AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heisick, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heisick, J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heisick, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 November; 50(5): 1313-1314

Comparison of enrichment broths for isolation of Campylobacter jejuni.

J Heisick

ABSTRACT

Growth of Campylobacter jejuni was compared in enrichment broths of Doyle and Roman (Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:1343-1353, 1982) and Park et al. (C. E. Park, Z. K. Stankiewicz, J. Lovett, and J. Hunt, Can. J. Microbiol. 27:841-842, 1981), as modified by Lovett et al. (J. Lovett, D. W. Francis, and J. M. Hunt, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:459-462, 1983). Inoculated foods used were cream-pudding types, which may be cross-contaminated by improper handling, improper storage of meats prepared simultaneously, or the use of raw milk as an ingredient. Both broths adequately supported growth.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 November; 50(5): 1313-1314







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.