AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Washington, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Washington, J. A., II
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Washington, J. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 July; 22(1): 96-99
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of the Enterotube System for Identification of Members of the Family Enterobacteriaceae

William Jeffery Martin, Pauline K. W. Yu and John A. Washington II

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901

ABSTRACT

The Enterotube system was evaluated, in parallel with conventional bacteriological procedures for the identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, by using bacterial strains from a variety of clinical specimens and from stock cultures. Excellent agreement between the two test systems was obtained with the following reactions: hydrogen sulfide, indole, Simmons' citrate, glucose, and lactose. Agreement was not as good (<85%) with the urea, phenylalanine deaminase, and dulcitol reactions. The Enterotube lysine decarboxylase test was unsatisfactory. The Enterotube method will correctly identify strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae approximately 50% of the time; if identification only as Klebsiella-Enterobacter-Serratia group is needed, the method will be correct 85% of the time. On the basis of this evaluation, the Enterotube system appears to be both simple and rapid for the presumptive identification of these bacteria. Because of the limited usefulness of the lysine decarboxylase test, the results obtained by this test system are less reliable than those obtained by conventional methods.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 July; 22(1): 96-99
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1971 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.