AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huppert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Huppert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Huppert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 September; 20(3): 328-332
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Methods for Coccidioidomycosis Complement Fixation

Milton Huppert, Patricia A. Chitjian and Alan J. Gross

Veterans Administration Hospital, San Fernando, California 91342
Western Research Support Center, Veterans Administration Hospital, Sepulveda, California 91343

ABSTRACT

A Laboratory Branch Task Force of the National Communicable Disease Center has proposed a standardized complement fixation procedure (LBCF) and an adaptation of this to microtitration techniques (MT) as uniform methods for performing complement fixation (CF) tests. A common procedure should make CF results from one laboratory more comparable to another. In addition, it would be preferable if the common procedure reproduced the titer levels of a testing procedure which is to be replaced, particularly when valid clinical interpretations have been derived from the latter. Replicated sets of sera were tested by the LBCF, MT, and the standard Smith CF procedure for coccidioidomycosis. Results with all three procedures were highly reproducible within an acceptable one-tube variation of a twofold dilution series, but the frequency of one-tube variations was greater with the MT method than with the other two. There was no statistical difference in the titers obtained with the Smith and LBCF procedures, but there was a significant difference when the MT results were compared to those with the Smith method. The LBCF method should be acceptable as a standardized and uniform CF procedure for coccidioidomycosis, subject to comparative testing between different laboratories.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 September; 20(3): 328-332
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1970 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.