AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelef, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jay, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shelef, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jay, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shelef, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jay, J. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 June; 19(6): 902-905
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of a Titrimetric Method to Assess the Bacterial Spoilage of Fresh Beef 1

Leora A. Shelef and James M. Jay

Department of Biology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202

ABSTRACT

A new method of determining bacterial spoilage in fresh beef is presented. The technique is based upon the fact that as beef undergoes refrigerator spoilage, there is a gradual increase in the production of alkaline substances by the spoilage flora. The level of these substances was measured by titrating meat homogenates to a pH 5.00 end point, employing 0.02 N HCl and an autotitrator. When 23 samples of ground beef from retail stores were tested, an average of 1.32 ml of acid was required for titration of 1 g of fresh beef to pH 5.00, whereas 2.58 ml was required for the same meat at the onset of spoilage. Preliminary data indicate that beef which requires more than 2 ml of 0.02 N HCl/g to lower its pH to 5.00 under the conditions of the test is in some state of incipient spoilage. The statistical correlation between titration values, log bacterial numbers, and extract-release volume was high (P < 0.001). The technique is simple to execute and is highly reproducible, and duplicate samples can be run within 15 min.


FOOTNOTES

1 Contribution No. 251 from the Department of Biology College of Liberal Arts.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 June; 19(6): 902-905
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1970 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.