AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seraichekas, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, O. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seraichekas, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, O. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seraichekas, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, O. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 December; 16(12): 1865-1871
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Viral Depuration by Assaying Individual Shellfish1

H. R. Seraichekas, D. A. Brashear, J. A. Barnick, P. F. Carey and O. C. Liu

Northeast Marine Health Sciences Laboratory, Environmental Control Administration, Public Health Service, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882

ABSTRACT

A study was carried out to further evaluate the practicability of viral depuration by assaying individual shellfish. The Northern quahaug and a strain of the type 1 attenuated poliovirus were used as the working model. Two types of depuration systems were employed: the small experimental tanks and a pilot-size tank with a capacity of approximately 24 bushels (836 liters) of shellfish. Volumes of the individual shellfish samples were found uniform throughout the experiments when a prior selection for the weight of the shellfish was made. There was also no significant difference in volumes of the individual samples during the course of depuration (24 to 96 hr). Under controlled hydrographic conditions, however, the uptake of virus in individual shellfish varied considerably. In general, the individual variability reached 10- to 100-fold. This wide variation would explain the variability of viral contents obtained in pooled samples during depuration as reported previously. During a later phase of depuration, although a great majority of shellfish were free of the virus, a few still harbored minimal amounts of contaminants. The presence of virus in some of the shellfish after various periods of depuration would, theoretically, be obscured by the pooling of the sampled shellfish. Further examination of the negative samples by assaying larger quantities than those routinely used revealed that a few still contained virus. To simulate naturally polluted shellfish as closely as technically possible, shellfish were polluted with minimal amounts of virus. The shellfish were cleansed more rapidly by the depuration process than were those polluted with more virus. Since the naturally polluted shellfish were shown to contain less virus than those studied in the laboratory, it is anticipated that the former type of shellfish may be cleansed more readily by this process within a reasonable period of time. Justification for a field trial of depuration in this country is presented.


FOOTNOTES

1 Contribution No. 31 from the Northeast Marine Sciences Laboratory, Narragansett, R.I. 02822.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 December; 16(12): 1865-1871
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.